Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
BMJ Open ; 13(6): e071228, 2023 06 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-20244540

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school workers within the Greater Vancouver area, British Columbia, Canada, after the first Omicron wave. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study by online questionnaire, with blood serology testing. SETTING: Three main school districts (Vancouver, Richmond and Delta) in the Vancouver metropolitan area. PARTICIPANTS: Active school staff enrolled from January to April 2022, with serology testing between 27 January and 8 April 2022. Seroprevalence estimates were compared with data obtained from Canadian blood donors weighted over the same sampling period, age, sex and postal code distribution. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid antibody testing results adjusted for test sensitivity and specificity, and regional variation across school districts using Bayesian models. RESULTS: Of 1850 school staff enrolled, 65.8% (1214/1845) reported close contact with a COVID-19 case outside the household. Of those close contacts, 51.5% (625/1214) were a student and 54.9% (666/1214) were a coworker. Cumulative incidence of COVID-19 positive testing by self-reported nucleic acid or rapid antigen testing since the beginning of the pandemic was 15.8% (291/1845). In a representative sample of 1620 school staff who completed serology testing (87.6%), the adjusted seroprevalence was 26.5% (95% CrI 23.9% to 29.3%), compared with 32.4% (95% CrI 30.6% to 34.5%) among 7164 blood donors. CONCLUSION: Despite frequent COVID-19 exposures reported, SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school staff in this setting remained no greater than the community reference group. Results are consistent with the premise that many infections were acquired outside the school setting, even with Omicron.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , British Columbia , Cross-Sectional Studies , Bayes Theorem , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Antibodies, Viral
2.
BMJ Open ; 12(4): e057846, 2022 04 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1962255

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Few studies reported COVID-19 cases in schools during the 2020/21 academic year in a setting of uninterrupted in-person schooling. The main objective was to determine the SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school staff in Vancouver public schools. DESIGN: Cumulative incident COVID-19 cases among all students and school staff based on public health data, with an embedded cross-sectional serosurvey among a school staff sample that was compared to period, age, sex and geographical location-weighted data from blood donors. SETTING: Vancouver School District (British Columbia, Canada) from kindergarten to grade 12. PARTICIPANTS: Active school staff enrolled from 3 February to 23 April 2021 with serology testing from 10 February to 15 May 2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence among school staff, based on spike (S)-based (unvaccinated staff) or N-based serology testing (vaccinated staff). RESULTS: Public health data showed the cumulative incidence of COVID-19 among students attending in-person was 9.8 per 1000 students (n=47 280), and 13 per 1000 among school staff (n=7071). In a representative sample of 1689 school staff, 78.2% had classroom responsibilities, and spent a median of 17.6 hours in class per week (IQR: 5.0-25 hours). Although 21.5% (363/1686) of surveyed staff self-reported close contact with a COVID-19 case outside of their household (16.5% contacts were school-based), 5 cases likely acquired the infection at school based on viral testing. Sensitivity/Specificity-adjusted seroprevalence in 1556/1689 staff (92.1%) was 2.3% (95% CI: 1.6% to 3.2%), comparable to a sex, age, date and residency area-weighted seroprevalence of 2.6% (95% CI: 2.2% to 3.1%) among 5417 blood donors. CONCLUSION: Seroprevalence among staff was comparable to a reference group of blood donors from the same community. These data show that in-person schooling could be safely maintained during the 2020/21 school year with mitigation measures, in a large school district in Vancouver, Canada.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , British Columbia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Seroepidemiologic Studies
3.
Front Public Health ; 10: 832444, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1952771

ABSTRACT

Background: The purpose of this study was to explore factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine intentions among school staff as high vaccine uptake is essential to ensure schools return to normal activities. Methods: Staff (e.g., teachers, administrators, student support workers) from three urban school districts in the Greater Vancouver Area of British Columbia, Canada completed a survey between February and June 2021 (n = 2,393) on COVID-19 vaccine intentions and perceptions (i.e., acceptance of routine vaccines, benefits and risks of vaccination, susceptibility to, and severity of COVID-19, recommendation by authority figures, information mistrust and conspiracy beliefs) as part of a COVID-19 seroprevalence study. Confirmatory factor analysis followed by multiple logistic regression models adjusting for relevant covariates were used to identify vaccine perceptions uniquely associated with (a) intention to get the COVID-19 vaccine (intention), and (b) intention to get vaccinated right away (urgency). Results: In total, 95.4% of participants of the seroprevalence study completed the vaccine questionnaire, corresponding to 17.7% of the target population. Vaccine intention was associated with staff who valued expert recommendations (AOR = 10.5, 95% CI = 7.39-14.90) accepted routine vaccines (AOR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.26-2.98) and perceived higher benefits (AOR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.01-1.65) and lower safety risks of vaccination (AOR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.29-0.54). Comparable associations were found with vaccine urgency. Perceived susceptibility to the COVID-19 virus was uniquely associated with vaccine urgency (AOR = 1.30, 95% CI = 1.05-1.61). A significant interaction effect (p = 0.01) revealed that staff who expressed mistrust in COVID-19 information intended to get vaccinated only if they also perceived high benefits of vaccination. Conclusions: Education about the risks and benefits of COVID-19 vaccines from a trusted source had the strongest relationship with vaccine intentions among this occupational group. Notably, those who expressed mistrust in information still intended to get vaccinated if they also perceived strong benefits of the vaccine.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , British Columbia , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Intention , Schools , Seroepidemiologic Studies
4.
J Affect Disord Rep ; 8: 100335, 2022 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1945384

ABSTRACT

Background: The aim of this study was to: 1) assess mental health symptoms in Canadian school staff during the second year of the pandemic (Spring 2021) and compare these same outcomes to national representative samples, and 2: examine whether the number of hours of direct contact with students was a significant predictor of anxiety symptoms. Methods: Online data on anxiety symptoms, psychological distress, overall mental health, and demographic information was collected from 2,305 school staff in the greater Vancouver area between February 3 and June 18, 2021, as part of a seroprevalence study. Results: School staff reported significantly higher anxiety symptoms than a national representative survey in Spring 2021 and higher exposure contact time with students was significantly associated with anxiety symptoms, in addition to sex and age, but not level of education and ethnicity. School staff also reported poorer mental health and higher levels of psychological distress compared to pre-pandemic population measures. Limitations: Cross-sectional design, self-report measures. Conclusions: These results show that priorities to reduce mental health challenges are critical during a public health crisis, not only at the beginning, but also one year later. Ongoing proactive prevention and intervention strategies for school staff are warranted.

5.
Microbiol Spectr ; 10(4): e0062222, 2022 08 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1938012

ABSTRACT

We prospectively studied SARS-CoV-2 transmission at schools in an era of variants of concern, offering all close contacts serial viral asymptomatic testing up to 14 days. From the 69 primary cases detected in schools, 392 close contacts were identified and offered asymptomatic testing. A total of 229 (58%) were close school contacts, and of these, 3 tested positive (1.3%), 2 of which were detected through asymptomatic testing. This is in contrast to the 117 household contacts, where 43 (37%) went on to become secondary cases. Routine asymptomatic testing of close contacts should be examined in the context of local testing rates, preventive measures, programmatic costs, and health impacts of asymptomatic transmission. IMPORTANCE There is concern that schools may be a setting where asymptomatic infections might result in significant "silent" transmission of SARS-CoV-2, particularly after the emergence of more transmissible variants of concern. After the programmatic implementation of a strategy of asymptomatic testing of close COVID-19 contacts as part of contact tracing in the school setting, the majority of the secondary cases were still found to have occurred in home or social contacts. However, for the 6.2% of secondary cases that occurred in close school contacts, the majority were detected through asymptomatic testing. The potential added yield of this approach needs to be considered within the overall setting, including consideration of the local epidemiology, ongoing goals of case and contact management, additional costs, logistical challenges for families, and possible health impacts of asymptomatic transmission.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , British Columbia/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Testing , Contact Tracing , Humans
6.
Journal of Nutrition Education & Behavior ; 54(7):S52-S53, 2022.
Article in English | CINAHL | ID: covidwho-1921166

ABSTRACT

The transition from elementary to secondary school is associated with deteriorating dietary habits among adolescents. Growing evidence suggests that COVID-19 has disrupted youth's dietary practices, but whether the pandemic moderated the impact of the transition on adolescents' diet remains unknown. This study examined how adolescents' diet changed as a result of the transition from elementary to secondary school, and explored whether the pandemic moderated these changes. This longitudinal study took place between 2018-2021. A total of 669 adolescents completed online 24-hour dietary recalls (ASA24) during elementary school (grade 7), and again in secondary school (grade 8). The first cohort (∼42% of the sample) had both grade 7 and 8 data collected prior to the start of the pandemic (hence, the pre-pandemic cohort). The second cohort had both grade 7 and 8 data collected during the pandemic (the pandemic cohort). The Total Healthy Eating Index (HEI) score (an indicator of overall dietary quality) and amounts of food groups (whole fruit, vegetables) were computed. Mixed effect models were used to evaluate transition and pandemic effects, including two-way interaction terms (pandemic X grade) to assess whether the pandemic moderated the impact of the transition on adolescents' diet. Dietary behavior deteriorated as a result of the transition to secondary school, with lower intakes of whole fruit (P = 0.005) and lower HEI scores (P = 0.023). We also found significant pandemic effects regardless of the adolescents' school year, with the pre-pandemic cohort reporting higher servings of both whole fruit (P = 0.012) and vegetables (P = 0.013) on weekdays compared to the pre-pandemic cohort. No significant interaction effects were found. The transition to secondary schools negatively affected adolescents' dietary behaviors regardless of whether it occurred during or prior to the pandemic. However, some dietary improvements were observed during the pandemic, which might be explained by greater availability of healthier foods at home. Future research should explore how environmental factors shape adolescents' diet during the school transition. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

7.
Int J Environ Res Public Health ; 18(16)2021 08 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1360758

ABSTRACT

The COVID-19 pandemic, and the public health measures to combat it, have strained the finances of many families. While parents transitioned to working from home, children transitioned to learning virtually, limiting their organized social and physical activities. Families also reduced the frequency and size of gatherings, impacting psychological wellbeing. This study sought to understand the influence of financial wellbeing on children's physical activity and leisure screen-based activities via mothers' and children's psychological wellbeing. In May and June of 2020, 254 Grade 7 Canadian children and their mothers completed separate online surveys assessing family financial wellbeing, mothers' and children's psychological wellbeing, and children's physical activity and leisure screen-based activities. Structural equation modelling was used to examine the indirect effects of mothers' and children's psychological wellbeing on the relationship between financial wellbeing and children's physical activity and leisure screen-based activities. Final models were adjusted for potential confounders. Study results indicate a significant indirect association between financial wellbeing and children's physical activity and leisure screen-based activities via mothers' and children's psychological wellbeing. These findings demonstrate that higher levels of financial wellbeing are associated with better mental and physical health benefits in children during the COVID-19 pandemic.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Canada , Child , Exercise , Humans , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL